What it is
SLU-PP-332 is a small molecule — a simple manufactured chemical, not a peptide (a peptide is a short chain of amino acids). It has a molecular weight of 290.32 g/mol and the formula C18H14N2O2. It was developed at Saint Louis University in the early 2000s. It gets sold next to peptides, which is why it turns up on peptide sites, but it is chemically a different kind of thing.
It is studied as an exercise mimetic, a compound that switches on some of the same processes inside your cells that physical exercise switches on. It does this by turning on a set of cell switches called oestrogen-related receptors (ERRs). Despite the name, these have nothing to do with oestrogen. They were named for looking similar to oestrogen receptors, they do not bind oestrogen, and turning them on does not change your oestrogen levels. There are three (alpha, beta, gamma) and SLU-PP-332 turns on all three, most strongly alpha.
This page covers the capsule version. There is nothing to mix and no injection. Capsules are commonly sold as 300 mcg (a microgram, one thousandth of a milligram) and 1,000 mcg, which is the same as 1 mg. Products on the market range from 100 mcg to a few milligrams per capsule.
Some important facts. SLU-PP-332 is not approved by any regulator. It has never been tested in a human clinical trial. Everything known about it in a living body comes from mouse studies; a 2025 pilot study used it on human muscle cells in a dish, which is not the same as giving it to a person. It is banned by WADA (S0 unapproved substances, and as a metabolic modulator and exercise mimetic), so tested athletes will be flagged. A 2026 study by the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory identified 22 metabolites of it specifically for doping control.
One gating rule from earlier guidance still stands: the 1,000 mcg capsules are not for people taking SLU-PP-332 for the first time.
SLU-PP-332 is a synthetic small molecule (C18H14N2O2, 290.32 g/mol) developed at Saint Louis University in the early 2000s. It is a pan-agonist of the oestrogen-related receptors ERRα, ERRβ and ERRγ, orphan nuclear receptors acting downstream of PGC-1α, with greatest potency at ERRα. The ERRs share structural homology with oestrogen receptors but do not bind oestrogen, and agonism has no effect on circulating oestrogen. The axis governs mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation gene expression and fatty-acid oxidation — hence the "exercise mimetic" label: the transcriptional signature of endurance adaptation without the mechanical stimulus.
This is the oral route, supplied as 300 mcg and 1,000 mcg capsules, with commercial products spanning roughly 100 mcg to a few milligrams per capsule. Note the scale difference against the injectable page on this site, which runs 1.25–2.5 mg subcutaneously; the routes are dosed on entirely different scales and are not interchangeable.
Regulatory and evidence status: not FDA approved, never tested in humans in vivo, classified as a research chemical only, and WADA-prohibited under S0 (unapproved substances) and the metabolic modulator/exercise mimetic categories. Avliyakulov, Sobolevsky and Ahrens (2026) characterised 22 in vitro metabolites in human liver microsomes for doping-control detection. All in vivo efficacy data are murine; the only human tissue data are the in vitro muscle-cell pilot of Bonanni et al. (2025).
Physicochemically the compound is hydrophobic: insoluble in water, sparingly soluble in DMSO (58 mg/mL) and slightly soluble in ethanol (2 mg/mL). Every published study delivered it intraperitoneally in a DMSO-based vehicle; no oral formulation has been published, and the developers have stated the structure needs modification for oral delivery. That fact dominates everything about this route.
The earlier gating rule is retained: 1,000 mcg capsules are restricted to second-or-later cycles in users who tolerated lower doses.
How it works
Your cells make most of their energy in mitochondria, the tiny power plants inside each cell that turn food into usable fuel. More mitochondria that work better means more energy, better endurance, more fat burned for fuel and a higher resting metabolism.
One of the main controllers of this system is a switch called ERR alpha. It turns on the genes that build new mitochondria, burn fat for fuel and make energy production more efficient. Every time you do endurance exercise your body flips this switch a little more, which is part of how you get fitter over time.
SLU-PP-332 flips that same switch chemically, without the exercise. That is the whole idea behind "exercise in a pill". Researchers checked this by giving the compound to mice bred without the ERR alpha gene, and the effects vanished, which showed the switch is genuinely what matters.
What it does not do matters just as much. Exercise switches on hundreds of pathways — muscle growth signals, brain factors, bone, immune function and more. SLU-PP-332 hits one of them. It cannot replace training, and anyone expecting it to will be disappointed.
In mice given an injection of 30 mg/kg, the compound was measurable in blood and muscle 6 hours later, and it is thought to last roughly 8 to 10 hours in the body, though no formal study has confirmed that. It does not get into the brain well. None of this has been measured in a person, and none of it tells you what happens when the compound is swallowed as a dry powder.
ERRα is the dominant transcriptional regulator of oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle. Acting with PGC-1α as co-activator, it drives the gene programmes for mitochondrial biogenesis, β-oxidation and electron-transport-chain efficiency. Endurance training raises ERRα activity as part of the normal adaptive response, producing more mitochondria, a shift toward lipid substrate use and improved endurance.
SLU-PP-332 agonises ERRα (and ERRβ/γ) directly, reproducing that transcriptional response without contractile stimulus. Billon et al. (2023) confirmed mechanism by repeating the exercise-capacity experiment in muscle-specific ERRα knockout mice, in which the effects were abolished, excluding off-target explanations. In the heart-failure model of Xu et al. (2024), ERRγ rather than ERRα was identified as the principal mediator of cardioprotection, with upregulation of cardiac fatty-acid-metabolism and mitochondrial genes preventing metabolic failure in the pressure-overloaded myocardium.
The limitation is scope. Exercise engages AMPK, mTOR, BDNF, IGF-1, myokine release, bone remodelling and immune signalling among many others; SLU-PP-332 engages one nuclear-receptor axis. It is a partial mimetic of a single limb of the adaptation.
Pharmacokinetics are rodent-only and thin. At 30 mg/kg IP, plasma exposure was 0.2 micromolar and muscle exposure 0.6 micromolar at 6 hours post-injection. Estimated plasma elimination half-life is approximately 8 to 10 hours, though no formal pharmacokinetic study establishing this has been published. Blood-brain-barrier penetration is poor.
For the oral route specifically, the mechanistic story stops at the gut wall. The compound is water-insoluble and must dissolve to cross the roughly 100 micrometre aqueous layer of the intestinal mucosa. Absorption from a dry-powder capsule therefore depends on bile secretion, co-ingested fat and individual gut variability; no oral bioavailability study exists, and claims of 40 to 50% oral bioavailability circulating online have no supporting data.
What it does
Everything known about what SLU-PP-332 does in a living body comes from mice given it by injection, not from people swallowing capsules.
In mice, it pushed cells to build more mitochondria and burn more fat. Treated mice ran 70% longer and 45% further, grew more oxidative muscle fibres and had more mitochondrial DNA. Obese mice on a high-fat diet lost about 12% of their body weight in 28 days without eating less or moving more — their metabolism simply ran hotter. Elderly mice had age-related kidney decline reversed. Mice with heart failure had better pumping function, less scarring and longer survival. In a dish, human muscle cells from inactive elderly women showed less oxidative stress, better survival and lower ageing markers.
Whether any of that happens when you swallow a capsule is unknown. The compound does not dissolve in water, so how much you absorb from a dry powder is unpredictable. That is the likely reason reports are so mixed: some people absorb enough to feel something, many absorb little and feel nothing.
Earlier guidance gives practical instructions: take it in the morning, on an empty stomach, daily (or five days on and two off). Note that taking it with fats probably helps absorption, because fats help dissolve compounds like this — "probably helps" is not proven, but it directly contradicts the fasted instruction, and the fasted rule has no absorption rationale behind it.
No human pharmacodynamic data exist. In murine models, ERR agonism produced the following: a 70% increase in running time and 45% increase in distance with more type IIa oxidative fibres, higher mitochondrial DNA content and increased grip strength after 6 and 13 days (Billon et al., 2023); approximately 12% body-weight loss over 28 days in diet-induced obese mice with minimal fat-mass gain, increased energy expenditure and fatty-acid oxidation, improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, reduced hepatic steatosis, and no change in food intake or activity (Billon et al., 2024); reversal of age-related albuminuria, podocyte loss, mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammatory cytokines in 21-month-old mice over 8 weeks, described as mimicking caloric restriction (Wang et al., 2023); and improved ejection fraction, reduced fibrosis and increased survival in pressure-overload heart failure (Xu et al., 2024). In vitro, human myocytes from inactive elderly women showed reduced oxidative stress, enhanced SIRT1 and PGC-1α, improved survival, myotube fusion and lower senescence markers (Bonanni et al., 2025).
Lipid effects: plasma total cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides all decreased; LDL was unchanged. The HDL reduction is the one adverse signal from the mouse literature.
Translating any of this to oral capsules is speculative. All efficacy data used intraperitoneal delivery in a DMSO/PEG 300/Tween 80 vehicle. Oral bioavailability is unmeasured and, given water insolubility, likely far lower and highly variable. The pattern in user reports — responders cluster among those dosing with fats, sublingually or at higher doses; non-responders overwhelmingly among standard capsule users — is consistent with an absorption-limited effect rather than a pharmacological null.
The earlier operating instructions (morning, fasted, daily or 5-on/2-off, no desensitisation expected over a short cycle) are retained for reference. The fasted requirement conflicts with the observation that co-ingested fat probably improves solubilisation of a lipophilic compound; neither position is backed by an oral study.
Benefits
Evidence grades: what the labels mean
- Human trials Supported by randomised or placebo-controlled human trials.
- Limited human data Some human evidence, such as pilot studies, case reports or observational data, but no controlled trials.
- Animal or lab only Shown in animal or cell studies only; not yet tested in people.
- Anecdotal No published studies; based on user reports or theory.
Each grade reflects the strongest published support for that specific claim, not for the compound as a whole.
- All benefits below were shown in mice given the compound by injection, or in human cells in a dish. None has been shown in a person, and none has been shown with capsules.Animal or lab only
- Endurance: treated mice ran 70% longer and 45% further, with more oxidative muscle fibres and more mitochondrial DNA. Grip strength rose after 6 and 13 days.Animal or lab only
- Fat loss: obese mice lost about 12% of body weight over 28 days without eating less or moving more, with almost no fat gain, better blood-sugar handling and less fatty liver.Animal or lab only
- Kidney protection: in elderly mice, 8 weeks of treatment reversed age-related kidney decline, protein leakage and inflammation.Animal or lab only
- Heart function: in mice with heart failure, treatment improved pumping, reduced scarring and increased survival.Animal or lab only
- Muscle cell health: human muscle cells from inactive elderly women showed less oxidative stress, more protective factors, better survival and lower ageing markers in a 2025 lab-dish pilot study.Animal or lab only
- The class rationale behind all of these is more mitochondria and more fat burned for fuel — the same adaptation endurance training produces.Animal or lab only
- All efficacy data are murine intraperitoneal or in vitro human cell culture; no human in vivo efficacy exists for any route, and no study has tested oral administration.Animal or lab only
- Exercise capacity (Billon et al., 2023): 70% longer running time, 45% greater distance, increased type IIa oxidative fibres and mitochondrial DNA content, increased grip strength at 6 and 13 days; effects abolished in muscle-specific ERRα knockouts.Animal or lab only
- Metabolic syndrome (Billon et al., 2024): approximately 12% body-weight loss over 28 days in high-fat-diet mice, minimal fat-mass gain, increased energy expenditure and fatty-acid oxidation, improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, reduced hepatic steatosis, no change in intake or activity.Animal or lab only
- Renal ageing (Wang et al., 2023): reversal of albuminuria, podocyte loss and mitochondrial dysfunction in 21-month-old mice over 8 weeks; reductions in TGF-β, PAI-1, Col IV, macrophage and tubular-injury markers; conserved ERR-pathway decline observed in human kidney tissue.Animal or lab only
- Heart failure (Xu et al., 2024): improved ejection fraction, reduced fibrosis, increased survival in pressure-overload models, mediated principally via ERRγ.Animal or lab only
- Muscle atrophy pilot (Bonanni et al., 2025): in myocytes from inactive women (n=10 inactive, n=10 active, 20 total hip-replacement donors), reduced oxidative stress, enhanced SIRT1 and PGC-1α, improved survival and myotube fusion, reduced senescence markers.Animal or lab only
- Class rationale: ERR-driven mitochondrial biogenesis and increased β-oxidation, raising energy expenditure without adrenergic drive.Animal or lab only
What to expect
There is no human clinical data, so there is no reliable timeline for what you would notice, when, or for how long. Everything here comes from what users report, and those reports are extremely mixed. The mixed picture is the most important thing to understand.
Some users report more energy, better endurance during cardio, a higher heart rate and feeling more out of breath during training in a way that suggests their metabolism is running harder, better recovery, better focus in the gym, and gradual fat loss over 4 to 8 weeks alongside diet and training. One user reported losing 11 pounds over 4 weeks and looking leaner while combining it with other compounds. Some say letting it dissolve under the tongue works more consistently than swallowing capsules.
Many users report feeling absolutely nothing. Some worked up from 250 mcg to 1500 mcg a day with no change. Others took 8 capsules at once and felt nothing. One took 1000 mcg daily for over a month with no measurable result.
The pattern is not random. The positive reports tend to come from people who take it with fats, use the under-the-tongue route or use higher doses. The negative reports overwhelmingly come from people swallowing standard capsules. That lines up with the absorption problem: the compound does not dissolve in water, so how much gets into your body from a dry capsule varies a lot from person to person and from day to day.
Side effects users report, sparsely and unverified, include low blood sugar at higher doses, disturbed sleep, mild stomach discomfort and fatigue. Low blood sugar is plausible given the compound raises metabolic rate, especially if you are fasting, undereating or using other things that lower blood sugar. Take that seriously if you dose fasted.
No human clinical data exist, so no evidence-based expectation of onset, magnitude or duration can be given. What follows is aggregated user report and carries correspondingly low weight.
Reported positives: increased energy, elevated heart rate and perceived metabolic demand during training (subjectively, feeling more out of breath), improved cardio endurance, improved recovery and focus, and gradual fat loss over 4 to 8 weeks when combined with diet and training. One user reported 11 pounds lost over 4 weeks with improved vascularity while stacking with other compounds. Sublingual administration is reported by some to produce more consistent effects than swallowed capsules.
Reported negatives: a large proportion of users report no effect at any dose. Titration from 250 mcg to 1500 mcg daily without perceptible change, 8 capsules taken at once without effect, and over a month at 1000 mcg daily without measurable results are all reported.
The distribution is not random. Responders cluster among those dosing with fats, dosing sublingually, or using higher doses; non-responders cluster among standard oral capsule users. This is exactly the pattern an absorption-limited, water-insoluble compound would produce: inter- and intra-individual variability in dissolution across the intestinal aqueous layer, dependent on bile output and co-ingested lipid.
Anecdotal adverse effects: hypoglycaemia at higher doses, sleep disturbance, mild gastrointestinal discomfort and fatigue, all sparse and unverified. Hypoglycaemia is mechanistically plausible given increased metabolic rate and fatty-acid oxidation, particularly under fasting, caloric restriction or concurrent glucose-lowering agents — relevant given the earlier fasted-morning instruction.
No multi-month or multi-year safety data exist in any species; the longest study was 8 weeks. Whatever is or is not felt over a 4 to 8 week cycle says nothing about long-term risk, including the unresolved question of chronic ERRα agonism in tissue that harbours undetected malignancy.
Reconstitution and dosing
There is no established human dose. No clinical trial has ever dosed SLU-PP-332 in a person by any route, and no study has ever tested it by mouth. This page does not propose a dose. What follows is context, plus earlier instructions, so you can judge them.
What the mouse studies used, all by injection into the abdomen in a DMSO-based liquid: 50 mg/kg twice daily for 7 to 15 days (exercise), 50 mg/kg twice daily for 28 days (fat loss), 25 mg/kg daily for 8 weeks (kidney) and 25 mg/kg twice daily (heart). Converting those to a human using the standard scaling factor (dividing by 12.3) gives roughly 140 mg per day (from 25 mg/kg) to 560 mg per day (from 50 mg/kg twice daily) for a 154 lb adult, assuming everything injected is absorbed. Capsules on the market contain 100 mcg to a few milligrams. That is a tiny fraction of the research doses — and even that fraction may not be absorbed, because the compound does not dissolve in water.
Earlier instructions, kept for reference: run a 4 to 8 week cycle, then take 2 to 4 weeks off. Dose daily (the short cycle means your body is not expected to stop responding), or five days on and two off. Take it in the morning on an empty stomach. With 300 mcg capsules: one capsule in week 1, then one or two capsules (300 to 600 mcg) once a day for the rest of the cycle. With 1,000 mcg capsules: one each morning for the whole cycle, and only if you have run a lower dose before and tolerated it without substantial side effects.
Two cautions on those instructions. First, taking it with fats probably helps absorption; that cuts against the fasted rule, and neither approach is proven. Second, low blood sugar has been reported at higher doses, and dosing fasted makes that more likely.
Do not try to solve the absorption problem by injecting capsule powder mixed with bacteriostatic water. The compound does not dissolve in water; you would be injecting floating particles. Research injections use a DMSO, PEG 300 and Tween 80 vehicle that most people cannot handle safely.
No human dosing protocol exists. No clinical trial has administered SLU-PP-332 to humans by any route, no study has tested oral administration in any species, and no oral bioavailability study has been published. No dose is proposed here.
Preclinical exposure, all intraperitoneal in a DMSO-based vehicle: 50 mg/kg twice daily for 7 to 15 days (Billon et al., 2023); 50 mg/kg twice daily for 28 days (Billon et al., 2024); 25 mg/kg daily for 8 weeks (Wang et al., 2023); 25 mg/kg twice daily, duration unspecified (Xu et al., 2024). Allometric conversion (divide by 12.3, standard FDA guidance) yields approximately 140 mg/day for 25 mg/kg and approximately 560 mg/day for 50 mg/kg twice daily in a 154 lb adult, assuming 100% bioavailability from IP delivery. Commercial capsules contain 100 mcg to a few milligrams. The gap between research exposure and marketed content is two to three orders of magnitude before the absorption question is even reached.
The absorption question is severe. SLU-PP-332 is insoluble in water, sparingly soluble in DMSO (58 mg/mL) and slightly soluble in ethanol (2 mg/mL). Dissolution across the roughly 100 micrometre intestinal aqueous layer from dry powder is unpredictable and depends on bile secretion, co-ingested fat and individual gut variability. Co-ingestion with fats probably improves solubilisation of a lipophilic compound but has not been tested. Online claims of 40 to 50% oral bioavailability have no supporting study. The developers have stated in their papers that the structure requires modification for oral delivery.
Earlier instructions, retained for reference and not endorsed: 4–8 week cycle, 2–4 week washout; daily dosing (short cycle, desensitisation not expected) or 5-on/2-off; morning, fasted. 300 mcg capsules: 300 mcg daily in week 1, then 300–600 mcg once daily for the remainder. 1,000 mcg capsules: 1,000 mcg each morning for the cycle, gated to second-or-later cycles with documented tolerance at lower doses. Note the fasted instruction conflicts with the solubilisation argument for fat co-ingestion, and that anecdotal hypoglycaemia at higher doses argues against fasted dosing.
Reconstituting capsule contents or raw powder in bacteriostatic water for injection does not produce a solution; it produces a particulate suspension. The published vehicle is 5% DMSO, 40% PEG 300, 5% Tween 80 and 50% sterile water. That is the injectable route's problem and is covered on the injectable page; it is not a workaround for the oral one.
Capsules — 300 mcg per capsule
Cycle: 4–8 week cycle followed by a 2–4 week washout · Frequency: Daily dosing recommended (the short cycle means desensitisation is not expected); 5 consecutive days on with 2 rest days is also acceptable. Morning, fasted
| When | Dose | How often |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | 1 capsule (300 mcg) | once per day, in the morning |
| Week 2 to end of cycle | 1–2 capsules (300–600 mcg) | once per day |
Capsules — 1,000 mcg per capsule (not for first-time users)
Cycle: 4–8 week cycle followed by a 2–4 week washout · Frequency: Daily dosing recommended; 5 consecutive days on with 2 rest days is also acceptable. Morning, fasted
| When | Dose | How often |
|---|---|---|
| Whole cycle — second or later cycle only, in users who tolerated lower doses | 1 capsule (1,000 mcg) | once per day, in the morning |
Who should avoid it
- First-time SLU-PP-332 users should avoid the 1,000 mcg capsules. Those are for people on a second or later cycle who tolerated lower doses without substantial adverse side effects.
- Do not use it if you have active cancer or tumours of any type, or any history of cancer. The receptor this compound switches on (ERR alpha) is one that many cancers use to grow. No study has shown SLU-PP-332 causes cancer, but chronically activating that receptor is an unknown risk, so anyone with a history of cancer should avoid it.
- Do not use it if you are a tested athlete in any sport. WADA prohibits it under its S0 category for unapproved substances and as a metabolic modulator and exercise mimetic. A 2026 study identified 22 metabolites specifically so that testing labs can detect it.
- Do not use it if you have a known hypersensitivity to SLU-PP-332 or any component of the capsule.
- Use extreme caution if you are pregnant or breastfeeding. There is no safety data of any kind.
- Use extreme caution if you have a metabolic disorder or a condition that affects blood sugar, or take medicines that lower blood sugar. Low blood sugar has been reported by users at higher doses.
- Use extreme caution if you have cholesterol concerns. HDL (the protective cholesterol) fell in mouse studies.
- Use extreme caution if you have a heart condition, because the compound acts on the heart, or liver impairment, because how humans break it down is unknown.
- Talk to a doctor before starting and go through your full medication list with them. This compound has never been tested in humans in any clinical trial and is not FDA approved.
- 1,000 mcg capsules remain contraindicated in SLU-PP-332-naive users; they are restricted to second-or-later cycles with documented tolerance of lower doses.
- Active cancer or tumours of any type, and any history of malignancy. ERRα is exploited by multiple tumour types: it is critical for ER-negative breast cancer growth (Stein et al., 2008), knockdown roughly doubled xenograft tumour growth time, it promotes cancer stem cell characteristics (Muduli et al., 2023) and VEGF expression (Stein et al., 2009), and it drives proliferation, migration and EMT in A549 lung cancer cells (Huang et al., 2014). The inverse agonist XCT-790 slows tumour growth across cancer types. Chronic pan-ERR agonism is therefore an unknown risk rather than a proven harm, but an absolute contraindication with any malignancy history.
- Tested athletes in any sport. WADA-prohibited under S0 (unapproved substances) and the metabolic modulator/exercise mimetic categories; the UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory (Avliyakulov et al., 2026) characterised 22 metabolites for doping control.
- Known hypersensitivity to SLU-PP-332 or any excipient.
- Extreme caution: pregnancy or lactation (no safety data in any form); metabolic disorders or glucose-affecting conditions; concomitant glucose-lowering medications (anecdotal hypoglycaemia, mechanistically plausible given increased metabolic rate and β-oxidation); dyslipidaemia (HDL decreased in Billon et al., 2024); cardiovascular disease (documented cardiac effects, ERRγ-mediated); hepatic impairment (human metabolic pathway unknown).
- No human clinical trial exists. The longest study in any species is 8 weeks. Paediatric use is unaddressed.
Side effects
- In mice, HDL cholesterol (the type usually considered protective for the heart) went down. Total cholesterol and triglycerides also fell, and LDL did not change. The HDL drop is the main concern.
- No other adverse effects were reported in the mouse studies, but the longest lasted only 8 weeks and none was designed to spot long-term harm such as cancer.
- The cancer question: SLU-PP-332 has not been shown to cause cancer. The concern is that the receptor it activates is one many cancers rely on to grow. Nobody knows what years of activation would do, or what happens if someone has an undetected early cancer. This is an unknown risk, not a proven harm.
- Users report low blood sugar at higher doses, disturbed sleep, mild stomach discomfort, and tiredness. These reports are sparse and unverified. Blood sugar drops are plausible because the compound raises metabolic rate and fat burning, especially if you are fasting, undereating, or taking other things that lower blood sugar. Note that the capsule protocol calls for fasted morning dosing, so watch for this.
- Morning-only dosing is the usual precaution against sleep disturbance from an energy-raising compound, and sleep disturbance has indeed been reported.
- No multi-month or multi-year safety data exists in any species.
- Lipids (Billon et al., 2024, metabolic syndrome model): total cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides all decreased; LDL unchanged. The HDL reduction is the notable adverse signal given its cardioprotective role.
- No other adverse effects were reported across the published mouse studies. The longest exposure was 8 weeks (Wang et al., 2023); none was powered or designed to detect carcinogenesis or other long-term toxicity.
- Oncological uncertainty: ERRα is a growth dependency in ER-negative breast cancer, lung cancer and other tumour types, and ERRα inhibition slows tumour growth. Chronic pan-ERR agonism in a host with undetected early-stage malignancy, or over years in healthy tissue, has never been examined with SLU-PP-332. Unknown risk, not demonstrated harm.
- User-reported (sparse, unverified): hypoglycaemia at higher doses, sleep disturbance, mild gastrointestinal discomfort, fatigue. Hypoglycaemia is mechanistically plausible from increased energy expenditure and fatty-acid oxidation, particularly under fasting, caloric deficit, or co-administered glucose-lowering agents — relevant because the oral protocol on this page is dosed fasted.
- The morning-only dosing convention implies a sleep-disturbance concern, which the forum reports corroborate.
- No multi-month or multi-year safety data exists in any species; the interaction between chronic ERR activation and cancer risk has never been studied directly.
What the evidence shows
Everything known about SLU-PP-332 in a living body comes from mice. It has never been given to a human in a clinical trial. Five studies looked at it directly, plus one on drug testing.
Exercise (2023): mice given 50 mg/kg twice daily by injection for 7 to 15 days ran 70% longer and 45% further than untreated mice. Their muscles gained more oxidative fibres and more mitochondrial DNA. Grip strength rose after 6 and 13 days. In mice lacking the ERR alpha gene, the effects vanished, proving the mechanism.
Fat loss (2024): obese mice on a high-fat diet lost about 12% of body weight over 28 days at 50 mg/kg twice daily, with almost no fat gain, better glucose tolerance and less fatty liver. They did not eat less or move more. Cholesterol and triglycerides fell; HDL fell too.
Kidney (2023): 21-month-old mice given 25 mg/kg daily for 8 weeks had age-related kidney decline reversed. Human kidney tissue showed the same age-related pathway decline, but treatment was only tested in mice.
Heart (2024): in mice with heart failure, 25 mg/kg twice daily improved pumping function, reduced scarring and increased survival.
Human cells (2025): muscle cells taken from 20 women during hip replacement (10 active, 10 inactive) were treated in a dish. Cells from the inactive women showed less oxidative stress and fewer ageing markers. This is lab-dish work, not a human trial.
Doping detection (2026): 22 metabolites identified for anti-doping labs.
The key point for this page: every study used injection with a DMSO-based vehicle. No study has ever tested oral capsules, and no oral bioavailability study exists. Claims of 40 to 50% oral bioavailability are unsupported. The mouse doses convert to roughly 140 to 560 mg per day for a 154 lb adult, while capsules on the market hold 100 mcg to a few milligrams.
Five direct efficacy studies plus one analytical study; all efficacy data are murine or in vitro. No human in vivo data exist.
Billon, Sitaula, Banerjee et al., ACS Chemical Biology, 2023. Male C57BL/6J mice, 50 mg/kg IP twice daily for 7–15 days: running time +70%, distance +45%, increased type IIa oxidative fibres and mtDNA content, grip strength up at 6 and 13 days. Muscle-specific ERRα knockouts showed no response (25 mg/kg for 15 days also tested in the knockout model), establishing ERRα dependence.
Billon, Schoepke, Avdagic et al., JPET, 2024. HFD-obese mice, 50 mg/kg IP twice daily for 28 days: ~12% body-weight loss, minimal fat-mass gain, increased energy expenditure and fatty-acid oxidation, improved insulin sensitivity, no change in food intake or activity. Total cholesterol, HDL and triglycerides decreased; LDL unchanged.
Wang, Myakala, Libby et al., American Journal of Pathology, 2023. 21-month-old mice, 25 mg/kg IP daily for 8 weeks: reversal of albuminuria, podocyte loss and mitochondrial dysfunction; reductions in TGF-β, PAI-1, Col IV, macrophage and tubular injury markers. Human kidney tissue showed parallel age-related ERR pathway decline.
Xu, Billon, Li et al., Circulation, 2024. Pressure-overload heart failure, 25 mg/kg IP twice daily: improved ejection fraction, reduced fibrosis, increased survival. ERRγ, not ERRα, was the principal mediator of cardioprotection via enhanced cardiac fatty-acid metabolism.
Bonanni, Falvino, Matticari et al., Frontiers in Physiology, 2025. Muscle from 20 women at hip replacement (active n=10, inactive n=10); in vitro treatment of inactive-donor myocytes reduced oxidative stress, raised SIRT1 and PGC-1α, promoted survival and fusion, reduced senescence markers.
Avliyakulov, Sobolevsky, Ahrens, Drug Testing and Analysis, 2026. 22 metabolites identified in human liver microsomes for doping control.
Pharmacokinetics: at 30 mg/kg IP, plasma 0.2 µM and muscle 0.6 µM at 6 hours; estimated rodent plasma half-life ~8–10 hours without a formal PK study; poor blood-brain barrier penetration.
Route-critical caveats: every study used IP injection in a DMSO-based vehicle. No oral administration study and no oral bioavailability study exist; the developers state the structure needs modification for oral delivery. The compound is water-insoluble (58 mg/mL in DMSO, 2 mg/mL in ethanol). Allometric conversion (÷12.3) of the mouse doses gives ~140–560 mg/day for a 154 lb adult, assuming 100% bioavailability — orders of magnitude above the 100 mcg to few-milligram capsule contents on the market.
User reports
From public forums
There is no human clinical data, so there is no established timeline for what to notice or when. Everything here comes from forum reports, which are anecdotal and carry far less weight than published research.
Reports are extremely mixed, and that inconsistency is the most important thing to understand.
Some users report more energy, better endurance during cardio, feeling more out of breath during workouts as if the metabolism is running harder, a higher heart rate while training, better focus, better recovery, and gradual fat loss over 4 to 8 weeks alongside training and diet. One user reported losing 11 pounds over 4 weeks while looking leaner and more vascular when combining it with other compounds.
Many users report feeling nothing at all. Some ramped from 250 mcg up to 1,500 mcg per day with no change. Others took 8 capsules at once and felt nothing. One user ran 1,000 mcg daily for over a month with no measurable result.
The pattern: positive reports tend to come from people who take it with fats, use it under the tongue (sublingual), or use higher doses. Negative reports overwhelmingly come from people swallowing standard capsules. This lines up with the absorption problem. SLU-PP-332 does not dissolve in water, so a dry powder capsule is absorbed unpredictably depending on bile, what you ate, and your individual gut. People who happen to absorb more notice something; people who do not absorb much notice nothing. Taking it with fats probably helps, but probably is not the same as proven.
No human in vivo data exist, so no evidence-based timeline of onset, magnitude or duration can be given. The following is aggregated from external forums (Reddit, AnabolicMinds, Canadian Brawn Forums, Eroids) and is anecdotal.
Positive reports: elevated heart rate and perceived metabolic demand during training, improved aerobic endurance, better training focus, improved recovery, and gradual fat loss over 4–8 weeks in conjunction with diet and training. One report of 11 lb lost over 4 weeks with increased vascularity, in combination with other compounds. Some users report sublingual administration gives more consistent effects than swallowed capsules.
Negative reports: a large fraction report no effect at any dose. Titration from 250 mcg to 1,500 mcg/day without response; 8 capsules at once without effect; 1,000 mcg daily for over a month without measurable change.
The distribution is not random. Responders cluster among users dosing with dietary fat, dosing sublingually, or using higher doses; non-responders are overwhelmingly on standard oral capsules. This is consistent with the solubility problem: a hydrophobic, water-insoluble compound in dry powder form must dissolve across an approximately 100 µm intestinal aqueous layer, making absorption dependent on bile secretion, meal composition and individual gut physiology. Co-administration with lipids plausibly improves solubilisation but no formal oral bioavailability study exists.
The fasted-morning instruction on this page's capsule protocol sits in tension with the observation that fat co-ingestion appears to aid absorption; users weighing the two should note that neither approach has bioavailability data behind it.
Users also report injecting reconstituted powder in bacteriostatic water and getting inconsistent results — expected, since the compound does not dissolve in water and the research vehicle is 5% DMSO, 40% PEG 300, 5% Tween 80, 50% sterile water.
User reports are individual experiences submitted by site visitors. They are not medical advice, are not verified for accuracy, and do not reflect Amino Reference's views. Read the evidence section above and talk to a clinician. Full disclaimer.
Stacking
The same compound as an injection. The doses are on a completely different scale — 1.25 to 2.5 mg there against 300 to 1,000 mcg here — so read that page before switching routes. Do not run both at once. Be aware that SLU-PP-332 does not dissolve in water; mixing it with bacteriostatic water leaves particles floating in liquid, which is why injectors also report inconsistent results. Every published study used a DMSO-based vehicle.
Same molecule, subcutaneous route, dosed at 1.25–2.5 mg against this page's 300–1,000 mcg. Route alternative, not an addition. Reconstitution in bacteriostatic water does not produce a solution; the research vehicle is 5% DMSO, 40% PEG 300, 5% Tween 80, 50% sterile water, and every published study used IP injection in a DMSO-based vehicle. Even so, human-equivalent doses derived from the mouse work (~140–560 mg/day) are far beyond either route's product doses.
Not a formal suggestion. A combined SLU-PP-332 + BAM-15 capsule exists, which is the clearest signal that the two are intended to be run together; that blend has its own page here. No study has tested SLU-PP-332 with any other compound.
There are no stacking data; no published study has examined SLU-PP-332 in combination with anything. The pairing is inferred from the SLU-PP-332 (250 mcg) + BAM-15 (50 mg) combination capsule on this site — an ERR agonist alongside a mitochondrial uncoupler, i.e. build oxidative capacity and then dissipate the proton gradient across it.
Also not a formal suggestion, but a combined SLU-PP-332 + 5-Amino-1MQ capsule exists and has its own page here. 5-Amino-1MQ is among the better-understood alternatives for metabolic goals.
Inferred from the existence of the combination capsule rather than from any study. NNMT inhibition raising NAD+ alongside ERR-driven mitochondrial biogenesis is a coherent pairing on paper; 5-Amino-1MQ is among the alternatives with better-characterised pathways.
- GLP-1 agonists (retatrutide, semaglutide, tirzepatide)
Different mechanisms and no known interaction. In theory SLU-PP-332 raises energy burn while GLP-1 drugs reduce appetite and improve blood sugar control. Whether the combination adds anything is unknown; users run them together, but no published data supports or warns against it. Both can lower blood sugar, so watch for hypoglycaemia.
Mechanistically orthogonal: ERR-mediated increases in energy expenditure and β-oxidation alongside incretin-driven appetite suppression and glycaemic regulation. No published data on the combination. Additive glucose-lowering is a plausible concern given anecdotal hypoglycaemia with SLU-PP-332 at higher doses. This site's SLU-PP-332 + orforglipron blend is a related pairing.
Both target mitochondria through different routes, so in theory they complement each other. Never studied together. MOTS-c is a better-understood alternative with real safety data for the same goals.
MOTS-c acts via AMPK activation; SLU-PP-332 via ERR agonism. Theoretically complementary, never co-studied. MOTS-c is a preferred alternative for mitochondrial function and fat oxidation given its better-characterised pathway and safety data.
SS-31 protects the inner membrane of existing mitochondria while SLU-PP-332 signals cells to build new ones. Complementary on paper, never studied together. SS-31 is a better-understood alternative.
SS-31 stabilises the inner mitochondrial membrane (cardiolipin); SLU-PP-332 drives mitochondrial biogenesis transcriptionally. Theoretically complementary, never co-studied. An alternative with actual safety data.
Not a stack suggestion but an alternative. NAD+, alongside MOTS-c and SS-31, supports mitochondrial function and fat burning through better-understood pathways, optionally with berberine and niacin.
An alternative rather than a stacking partner: NAD+, MOTS-c and SS-31 support mitochondrial function, fat oxidation and metabolic improvement via better-characterised pathways with safety data, and can be combined with berberine and niacin.
Common questions
Is SLU-PP-332 a peptide?
No. It is a manufactured small molecule, not a chain of amino acids. It gets grouped with peptides only because the same vendors sell it.
No. It is a synthetic small molecule, molecular weight 290.32 g/mol, formula C18H14N2O2. Its association with peptides is commercial, not chemical.
Does SLU-PP-332 affect oestrogen levels?
No. The receptors it acts on are called oestrogen-related only because they look similar in shape to oestrogen receptors. They do not bind oestrogen and activating them does not change your oestrogen.
No. ERRα, ERRβ and ERRγ are orphan nuclear receptors named for structural homology with oestrogen receptors. They do not bind oestrogen and their activation has no effect on oestrogen levels.
Does oral SLU-PP-332 work?
The evidence is mixed at best. It does not dissolve in water, so absorption from a capsule is unpredictable. No oral absorption study has ever been published, and the researchers who made it still inject it in every study. Some people report effects; many report nothing.
Unproven. The compound is water-insoluble (58 mg/mL in DMSO, 2 mg/mL in ethanol), making intestinal absorption erratic. No formal oral bioavailability study exists; claims of 40–50% are unsupported. The developers state the structure needs modification for oral delivery and have published no oral formulation. Mixed user reports map to this absorption variability.
What is the right dose?
Nobody knows. No human dose-finding study exists. The mouse doses convert to roughly 140 to 560 mg per day for a person, and most capsules contain a tiny fraction of that. Even with the right dose, the absorption problem would remain.
Undetermined. No human dose-finding study exists. Allometric conversion of the murine 25–50 mg/kg regimens gives ~140–560 mg/day for a 154 lb adult, assuming 100% bioavailability; commercial capsules contain 100 mcg to a few milligrams. The bioavailability problem compounds the dose gap.
Can it be reconstituted with bacteriostatic water?
No. It does not dissolve in water, so you would be injecting water with particles in it. The research vehicle uses DMSO, PEG 300 and Tween 80.
No. SLU-PP-332 is insoluble in water and will not enter solution in bacteriostatic water. The research vehicle is 5% DMSO, 40% PEG 300, 5% Tween 80, 50% sterile water.
Does SLU-PP-332 cause cancer?
No study has shown that it does. The worry is that the receptor it activates is one many cancers use to grow, and blocking that receptor slows tumours in breast, lung and other cancers. Long-term activation is an unknown risk. Anyone with a history of cancer should avoid it.
No study demonstrates carcinogenicity. ERRα is a growth dependency across breast, lung and other cancers, and ERRα inhibition (e.g. XCT-790) slows tumour growth. Chronic agonism of that receptor is an unresolved risk; the longest study was 8 weeks and none was designed to detect tumourigenesis. Absolute contraindication with any malignancy history.
Will it show up on a drugs test?
Yes, if you are a tested athlete. WADA bans it, and a 2026 study identified 22 breakdown products so labs can detect it.
Yes. WADA-prohibited under S0 and the metabolic modulator/exercise mimetic categories. Avliyakulov, Sobolevsky and Ahrens (2026) characterised 22 metabolites in human liver microsomes for doping control.
References
- Billon C, Sitaula S, Banerjee S, et al. Synthetic ERR alpha/beta/gamma Agonist Induces an ERR alpha-Dependent Acute Aerobic Exercise Response and Enhances Exercise Capacity. ACS Chemical Biology. 2023;18(4):756-771.
- Billon C, Schoepke E, Avdagic A, et al. A Synthetic ERR Agonist Alleviates Metabolic Syndrome. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2024;388(2):232-240.
- Wang XX, Myakala K, Libby AE, et al. Estrogen-Related Receptor Agonism Reverses Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Inflammation in the Aging Kidney. American Journal of Pathology. 2023;193(12):1969-1987.
- Xu W, Billon C, Li H, et al. Novel Pan-ERR Agonists Ameliorate Heart Failure Through Enhancing Cardiac Fatty Acid Metabolism and Mitochondrial Function. Circulation. 2024;149(3):227-250.
- Bonanni R, Falvino A, Matticari A, et al. Targeting ERRs to counteract age-related muscle atrophy associated with physical inactivity: a pilot study. Frontiers in Physiology. 2025;16:1616693.
- Avliyakulov NK, Sobolevsky T, Ahrens E. Analysis and Identification of In Vitro Metabolites of Exercise Mimetic SLU-PP-332 ERR alpha/beta/gamma Agonist for Doping-Control Purposes. Drug Testing and Analysis. 2026;18(3):439-450.
- Stein RA, Chang CY, Kazmin DA, et al. Estrogen-related receptor alpha is critical for the growth of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2008;68(21):8805-8812.
- Muduli K, Prusty M, Pradhan J, et al. Estrogen-Related Receptor Alpha (ERR alpha) Promotes Cancer Stem Cell-Like Characteristics in Breast Cancer. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2023;19(8):2807-2819.
- Stein RA, Gaillard S, McDonnell DP. Estrogen-related receptor alpha induces the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer cells. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2009;114(3-5):131-138.
- Huang JW, Guan BZ, Yin LH, et al. Effects of estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERR alpha) on proliferation and metastasis of human lung cancer A549 cells. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology Medical Sciences. 2014;34(6):875-881.
This entry has been reviewed and expanded with additional reference material. Units are recomputed from the stated protocol.